Direct comparison
AWS vs IONOS Cloud
AWS or IONOS Cloud? The direct cloud comparison of services, data centers, costs and sovereignty. Hyperscaler versus European cloud – focused on sovereignty, GDPR and compliance.
Management summary
As of 2026-07AWS and IONOS Cloud represent two different cloud strategies: AWS offers the deepest and broadest portfolio on the market (Strategic Opportunities 10/10) with global reach (9/10) and top scores in core infrastructure, but is characterized by US jurisdiction (SEAL 4.1/10) and higher costs (Price 4/10). IONOS Cloud positions itself as a highly sovereign EU provider with maximum operational sovereignty (10/10) and strong technological independence (9/10), offers a cost-effective proposition (Price 8/10) and a strong Bare Metal portfolio (8/10), but has a more limited service spectrum in AI (3/10) and Big Data (3/10). The choice depends primarily on requirements for data sovereignty, budget, and the need for global scaling and specialized PaaS services.
Methodology & data basisAWS
HyperscalerUSP: Market leader with the widest range of features and global reach
Recommendation: Recommended for innovation drivers and international scaling
IONOS Cloud
EU providerUSP: German cloud with independent radio of CPU and RAM in public Cloud, Broad offering of shared and dedicated instances.
Recommendation: Recommended for cost-conscious companies that focus on the EU market and require a mix of shared and dedicated hardware.
Performance chart
AWS and IONOS Cloud across 8 core categories, compared with the average of all providers (1–10).
Market positioning
All 13 providers by sovereignty and portfolio performance — purely computed from the category ratings.
Positions are purely computational: X = mean of technological & operational sovereignty, Y = mean of all remaining rating categories (each 1–10). Not a ranking recommendation. Methodology & data basis
Strengths & weaknesses
Automatically derived from the editorially reviewed rating data and backed by the category ratings (1–10) — fair to both sides.
Strengths
- Broadest service portfolio with 200+ services, ranging from IaaS to Quantum Computing and GenAI (Strategic Opportunities 10/10).
- Excellent core infrastructure competencies in databases, storage, networking, and virtualization, each rated 10/10.
- Global market leadership with 114 data centers, 30+ regions, and 700 Points of Presence across 6 continents (Global Reach 9/10).
- Strong data security and encryption with scores of 9/10 in both categories, supported by CloudHSM, KMS, and Nitro Enclaves.
Points to consider
- Low technological sovereignty (4/10) due to proprietary technologies and high lock-in, making a later exit difficult.
- Weak price competitiveness (Price 4/10) with particularly high costs for CPU (4.2/10), RAM (3.0/10), and Egress (3.0/10).
- Low SEAL score (4.1/10) with SOV-2 Legal at 2/10 in particular, due to the US CLOUD Act.
Strengths
- Highest operational sovereignty (10/10) with full control from Europe and independence from non-European interventions.
- Strong technological sovereignty (9/10) through an open standard stack and low lock-in, promoting exit-friendliness.
- Good price-performance ratio (Price 8/10) with competitive costs, particularly for CPU, RAM, and Egress.
- Strong Bare Metal offering (8/10) with a wide range of dedicated physical servers for specific performance requirements.
Points to consider
- Weak AI and Big Data capabilities (3/10 each), indicating a limited offering of managed training, inference, and analytics platforms.
- Limited global reach (4/10) with presence primarily in Europe and few US locations, which is a limitation for a global customer base.
- Average high availability (5/10) with weaker coverage by regions and Availability Zones as well as disaster recovery tooling compared to the average.
Which provider when?
Use-case-based decision aid — both options are a valid choice.
Choose AWS if:
- You need the broadest available service portfolio for complex, innovative use cases beyond classic IaaS (Strategic Opportunities 10/10).
- Your application requires global scaling and low latency in many regions outside Europe (Global Reach 9/10).
- You rely on sophisticated Big Data analytics or managed AI/ML platforms such as SageMaker and Bedrock (Big Data 9/10, AI 7/10).
- Highest availability and redundant infrastructure across many Availability Zones are critical (High Availability 10/10).
Choose IONOS Cloud if:
- Data sovereignty and independence from US laws are the highest priority (Operational Sovereignty 10/10, SEAL 8.0/10).
- You are looking for a cost-effective cloud solution with transparent pricing for IaaS workloads (Price 8/10).
- Your workloads benefit from dedicated hardware or Bare Metal servers (Bare Metal 8/10).
- You prefer open standards and low vendor lock-in for easy migrations (Technological Sovereignty 9/10).
Service comparison by category
All 19 rating categories in a head-to-head duel (1–10). A notable lead is marked from a 2-point difference.
| Category | AWSvsIONOS CloudScale 1–10 | Avg. all | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Security & Encryption | 97 | 7.8 | Lead AWS |
| Technological Sovereignty | 49 | 7.4 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Operational Sovereignty | 710 | 8 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Strategic Capabilities | 106 | 6.2 | Lead AWS |
| Price | 48 | 6.4 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Collaboration Tools | 47 | 5.1 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Global Reach | 94 | 4.5 | Lead AWS |
| Big Data | 93 | 4.8 | Lead AWS |
| AI | 73 | 4.8 | Lead AWS |
| Bare Metal | 38 | 5.2 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Virtualization | 106 | 5.7 | Lead AWS |
| Containerization | 98 | 7.3 | balanced |
| Databases | 107 | 6.9 | Lead AWS |
| High Availability | 105 | 6.7 | Lead AWS |
| Microsoft | 64 | 4.5 | Lead AWS |
| Linux | 108 | 8.8 | Lead AWS |
| Encryption | 97 | 6.8 | Lead AWS |
| Storage | 108 | 7.7 | Lead AWS |
| Network | 107 | 7.8 | Lead AWS |
Management Summary
Sovereign Cloud
SEAL Framework
Strategic (15 %)
Legal & Jurisdictional (10 %)
Data & AI (10 %)
Operational (15 %)
Supply Chain (20 %)
Technology (15 %)
Security & Compliance (10 %)
Environmental (5 %)
Availability & Locations
Compute
shared & low-budget
Hot Storage
Cold Storage
Managed Databases
Network & Security
Orchestration
Virtualization
Management
Big Data
AI & Machine Learning
Compliance & Certificates
German cloud security catalogue
IT service management system standard
Information security management system
Cloud security controls for providers
Personal data protection for cloud
Privacy information management extension
Energy management for data centers
Cloud Security Alliance assurance registry
Service organization control audit reports
Payment card data security standard
Quality management system standard
Cost Indication
vCPU/h
H100/h
GB/h
CPU/h
Ratio1/4
GB/h | 3000 IOPS
GB/h
GB/h
GB/h
Cluster/h
per 1 Mil Requests
GB-Sec
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
per GB
Our comparison methodology
The scores show a relative price comparison per service category. The lowest price earns 10 points; higher prices are marked down proportionally. Missing services are treated neutrally.
As of: List prices as of 11 September 2025, location Germany (DE).
More cloud comparisons
Frequently asked questions: AWS vs IONOS Cloud
What is the difference between AWS and IONOS Cloud?
AWS is a global hyperscaler with the deepest and broadest portfolio (Strategic Opportunities 10/10) and strong global presence (9/10), but with US jurisdiction (SEAL 4.1/10) and higher costs (Price 4/10). IONOS Cloud is an EU provider with the highest operational sovereignty (10/10) and strong technological independence (9/10), offers a cost-effective proposition (Price 8/10) and a strong Bare Metal portfolio (8/10), but has a more limited service spectrum in AI (3/10) and Big Data (3/10).
Which provider is more sovereign?
IONOS Cloud is significantly more sovereign with a SEAL score of 8.0/10 (80%) and maximum operational sovereignty (10/10). AWS has a SEAL score of 4.1/10 (41%) and operational sovereignty of 7/10, due to US jurisdiction and the US CLOUD Act.
Which provider is cheaper?
IONOS Cloud is more cost-effective with a price score of 8/10 and a cost rating of 8.0/10. AWS has a price score of 4/10 and a cost rating of 6.0/10. However, actual costs are workload-dependent and vary depending on the services and configuration used.
Which provider offers better AI and Big Data services?
AWS offers significantly better AI and Big Data services with scores of 7/10 for AI and 9/10 for Big Data, including services such as SageMaker, Bedrock, EMR, and Glue. IONOS Cloud has scores of 3/10 in both categories and offers a more limited selection.
Which provider is better suited for Bare Metal workloads?
IONOS Cloud is better suited for Bare Metal workloads with a score of 8/10 and a wide range of dedicated physical servers. AWS has a score of 3/10 here and offers less variety than specialized EU providers.
Not sure which provider fits you?
The Cloud Compass determines the best cloud for your use case — data-driven and vendor-neutral.
Start Cloud Compass