Direct comparison
OVHcloud vs STACKIT
OVHcloud or STACKIT? The direct cloud comparison of services, data centers, costs and sovereignty. Services, pricing, data centers and sovereignty in a direct comparison.
Management summary
As of 2026-07OVHcloud and STACKIT represent different strategies in the sovereign cloud market as EU providers: OVHcloud focuses on a broad, global portfolio with strong bare metal infrastructure and competitive pricing, while STACKIT, as a focused Germany cloud, offers maximum operational control and data security for IaaS/PaaS workloads. OVHcloud impresses with a comprehensive storage and network offering as well as high technological sovereignty, but is limited in Microsoft integrations and production AI services. STACKIT excels with excellent Linux support and the highest scores in operational sovereignty, but deliberately forgoes global reach and bare metal options. Companies with a strong focus on cost and a need for dedicated hardware or global presence will find a better fit with OVHcloud. Organizations that must meet strict compliance requirements in the DACH region and rely on Linux-based, containerized architectures will benefit more from STACKIT's focused platform.
Methodology & data basisOVHcloud
EU providerUSP: Leading European Cloud, Possibility to combine Private Cloud with Bare Metal and Public Cloud
Recommendation: Recommended for cost-conscious companies that require global scalability and strong EU data protection
STACKIT
EU providerUSP: German cloud with maximum compliance and a clear focus on IaaS and PaaS
Recommendation: Recommended for organizations prioritizing local security and trust
Performance chart
OVHcloud and STACKIT across 8 core categories, compared with the average of all providers (1–10).
Market positioning
All 13 providers by sovereignty and portfolio performance — purely computed from the category ratings.
Positions are purely computational: X = mean of technological & operational sovereignty, Y = mean of all remaining rating categories (each 1–10). Not a ranking recommendation. Methodology & data basis
Strengths & weaknesses
Automatically derived from the editorially reviewed rating data and backed by the category ratings (1–10) — fair to both sides.
Strengths
- OVHcloud offers the most mature bare metal offering with a score of 10/10 (average of all providers: 5.2), enabling dedicated physical servers for specific hardware requirements.
- The Cost Rating is significantly above the average of all providers (6.4/10) at 8.0/10, supported by Savings Plans of up to 54% and low egress costs.
- With scores of 9/10 in technological and operational sovereignty and a SEAL Score of 8.6/10, OVHcloud provides a strong foundation for data-sensitive applications.
- The storage portfolio reaches the highest level of development with 10/10 (average of all providers: 7.7) and the network with 9/10 (average of all providers: 7.8), including mature managed Kubernetes services (9/10).
Points to consider
- Microsoft integration is weakly pronounced with 4/10 (average of all providers: 4.5), making the platform less suitable for Windows Server or Active Directory-heavy environments.
- Strategic opportunities are at 6/10 (average of all providers: 6.2); important services such as serverless, confidential computing, and certain firewall components are not yet available in production ('announced').
- The AI offering only reaches 5/10 (average of all providers: 4.8); although slightly above average, many production managed AI services are missing, as parts of the portfolio are only announced.
Strengths
- STACKIT achieves the maximum score of 10/10 in operational sovereignty (average of all providers: 8), guaranteeing the highest level of control from Europe without non-EU intervention.
- With 9/10 in data security & encryption (average of all providers: 7.8), STACKIT offers technical protection mechanisms such as Confidential Cloud by Edgeless Systems and a Secrets Manager.
- Linux support is leading in the comparison field with 10/10 (average of all providers: 8.8), making STACKIT the optimal target platform for Linux workloads.
- STACKIT offers a solid managed database portfolio with 8/10 (average of all providers: 6.9), which includes true DBaaS services such as PostgreSQL Flex, MariaDB, and MongoDB Flex.
Points to consider
- STACKIT has no global reach (1/10, average of all providers: 4.5) with only 2 regions in 2 countries (Germany and Austria), making it unsuitable for workloads outside Europe.
- The AI and big data offering is sparse with 3/10 each (average of all providers: 4.8 and 4.8 respectively); many AI services are only 'announced' and Dremio is in beta stage.
- There is no collaboration portfolio (1/10, average of all providers: 3.7) and no bare metal offering (1/10, average of all providers: 5.2), which clearly limits the focus to pure IaaS/PaaS infrastructure.
Which provider when?
Use-case-based decision aid — both options are a valid choice.
Choose OVHcloud if:
- if you need dedicated physical servers (bare metal) for specific hardware requirements or high performance.
- if cost efficiency is a decisive factor and you want to benefit from Savings Plans and low egress costs.
- if you need a cloud platform with global reach outside Europe (e.g., USA, Asia).
- if you are looking for a broad portfolio of storage solutions (block, file, object, archive) and mature managed Kubernetes services.
Choose STACKIT if:
- if maximum operational sovereignty and control from Europe (score 10/10) are of highest priority.
- if you operate Linux-based workloads on a platform with excellent open-source support (score 10/10).
- if you must meet strict compliance requirements in the DACH region and rely on confidential computing (Edgeless Systems).
- if you prefer a focused IaaS/PaaS offering without distraction from non-production or global services.
Service comparison by category
All 19 rating categories in a head-to-head duel (1–10). A notable lead is marked from a 2-point difference.
| Category | OVHcloudvsSTACKITScale 1–10 | Avg. all | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Security & Encryption | 79 | 7.8 | Lead STACKIT |
| Technological Sovereignty | 99 | 7.4 | balanced |
| Operational Sovereignty | 910 | 8 | balanced |
| Strategic Capabilities | 65 | 6.2 | balanced |
| Price | 85 | 6.4 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Collaboration Tools | 65 | 5.1 | balanced |
| Global Reach | 61 | 4.5 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Big Data | 63 | 4.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
| AI | 53 | 4.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Bare Metal | 101 | 5.2 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Virtualization | 86 | 5.7 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Containerization | 96 | 7.3 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Databases | 78 | 6.9 | balanced |
| High Availability | 86 | 6.7 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Microsoft | 44 | 4.5 | balanced |
| Linux | 810 | 8.8 | Lead STACKIT |
| Encryption | 78 | 6.8 | balanced |
| Storage | 107 | 7.7 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Network | 98 | 7.8 | balanced |
Management Summary
Sovereign Cloud
SEAL Framework
Strategic (15 %)
Legal & Jurisdictional (10 %)
Data & AI (10 %)
Operational (15 %)
Supply Chain (20 %)
Technology (15 %)
Security & Compliance (10 %)
Environmental (5 %)
Availability & Locations
Compute
shared & low-budget
Hot Storage
Cold Storage
Managed Databases
Network & Security
Orchestration
Virtualization
Management
Big Data
AI & Machine Learning
Compliance & Certificates
German cloud security catalogue
IT service management system standard
Information security management system
Cloud security controls for providers
Personal data protection for cloud
Privacy information management extension
Energy management for data centers
Cloud Security Alliance assurance registry
Service organization control audit reports
Payment card data security standard
Cost Indication
vCPU/h
H100/h
GB/h
CPU/h
Ratio1/4
GB/h | 3000 IOPS
GB/h
GB/h
GB/h
Cluster/h
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
per GB
Our comparison methodology
The scores show a relative price comparison per service category. The lowest price earns 10 points; higher prices are marked down proportionally. Missing services are treated neutrally.
As of: List prices as of 11 September 2025, location Germany (DE).
More cloud comparisons
Frequently asked questions: OVHcloud vs STACKIT
What is the difference between OVHcloud and STACKIT?
OVHcloud offers a broader, global portfolio with a strong focus on bare metal, storage, and competitive prices (Cost Rating 8.0/10). STACKIT is a focused Germany cloud with the highest operational sovereignty (10/10) and strong data security (9/10), but forgoes global reach and bare metal options.
Which provider is more sovereign?
STACKIT achieves the highest score in operational sovereignty with 10/10 and offers a SEAL Score of 8.2/10. OVHcloud is also very high with 9/10 in operational sovereignty and a SEAL Score of 8.6/10, but its global presence offers a more complex legal landscape. For maximum operational control from Europe, STACKIT is better positioned.
Which provider is cheaper?
OVHcloud has a significantly better Cost Rating of 8.0/10 compared to 5.4/10 for STACKIT. This is reflected in lower prices for CPU, GPU, and storage. Actual costs, however, are always workload-dependent; STACKIT offers free egress costs (10/10), which can be advantageous for large amounts of data, but the overall picture favors OVHcloud.
Which provider is better for Linux workloads?
STACKIT achieves the maximum score of 10/10 in the Linux category (average of all providers: 8.8), making it the optimal choice for Linux-based architectures. OVHcloud is good with 8/10, but not leading in this category.
Do both providers offer bare metal servers?
No. OVHcloud offers a comprehensive bare metal offering with a score of 10/10. STACKIT does not offer dedicated physical servers (score 1/10) and instead focuses on virtual instances and containers.
Not sure which provider fits you?
The Cloud Compass determines the best cloud for your use case — data-driven and vendor-neutral.
Start Cloud Compass